|
Q1 |
Whether
PI(F)A members met Grama Panchayati members? |
 |
|
The
responsibility of watershed development program is with
Grama Panchayati which is a local governance unit. The
Guidelines desire that the PFA takes the Grama Panchayati
into full confidence and empower the same in the project
implementation. As part of this, initial rapport between
Grama Panchayati and PFA is an important requirement and
this is a mandatory process. |
|
What is happening and how is
this happening? |
-
In
majority of watersheds (75%), the interactions with
Grama Panchayati and PFA are fairly high. All members of
Grama Panchayati and PFA formally interacted with each
other in the context of APRLP.
-
In
25% of remaining cases, the formal interaction between
Grama Panchayati and PFA (PIA) was not mandatory (as per
previous guidelines).
-
Interestingly,
both NGO and GO PFA (PIA) have followed similar
processes in this key event.
|
|
Q2 |
Are
special efforts made to target women in awareness camps? |

|
|
Gender
is one of the core concerns of APRLP. It is important that
both men and women are aware of the benefits of the project.
Generally the awareness camps target men only and no
"special" efforts are made to involve women in
this process. As a result women are completely in dark about
the project and its benefits to them. So it is desired that
PFA makes "special" efforts to reach out women and
improve their understanding and role in the project. |
|
What is happening and how is
this happening? |
-
Neglecting
women during awareness camps is still a common practice
(in 40% cases). This practice is more predominant in Non
APRLP projects.
-
Another
common practice is to talk to women who are already
organized in SHG and VO. PFA does not interact with
women are not members of these groups. This practice is
predominant in APRLP projects.
-
In
limited number of cases, women leaders of the village
took the lead role to reach out other women in the
village. Women Sarpanch and leaders (of caste groups)
organized special events to explain about the project
contents to women. These special efforts are made in NGO
facilitated projects in APRLP projects.
|
|
Q3 |
What
methods are used to bring awareness about watershed program
in the village? Where are they conducted? How many times? |

|
|
Bringing
awareness about the program and its benefits is an important
first step to make the program transparent and
participatory. It is desired to organize several awareness
campaigns in the village and target all sections of the
village, particularly to women and resource poor families.
These special efforts will include those communities, which
are otherwise excluded. |
|
What is happening and how is
this happening? |
-
The
most common practices to generate awareness camps are -
grama sabha, kalajata (folk medium), transact.
-
Both
NGO and GO PFAs made equal efforts in APRLP projects,
while NGO PIA are more active in Non APRLP projects.
This indicates special efforts in APRLP projects by
project authorities irrespective of type of PIAs.
-
It
is observed that small group meetings (12% of villages)
improved the understanding of the communities to a great
extent about the program and developed rapport between
PFA team and these groups.
-
The
most common locations for these programs are Grama
Panchayati office, ratcha banda (common place in the
village) or school.
-
Only
in limited number of cases, special efforts are made to
interact with farmers in their own fields during
awareness campaigns.
|
|
Q4 |
Where
are the initial awareness camps conducted? (Location) |

|
|
Q5 |
Did
men and women discuss together about the issues of watershed
project, during awareness / initial phase? How did these
discussions happen? |

|
|
Awareness
generation among the communities, particularly women and
resource poor is an important first step of APRLP. Special
attempts are to be made to reach out to women and resource
poor families. Working only with women and giving some part
of the project does not complete the gender integration in
any project. Addressing the relationship between men and
women in the context of projects is an important aspect of
gender integrated watershed projects. So it is important
that both men and women have common meetings and discussions
on the issues related to watershed projects. |
|
What is happening and how is
this happening? |
-
Most
common locations for conducting awareness camps are
common place in the village, school and near Grama
Panchayati building. Village meetings and Kalajataha
(folk arts form) are the most common methods for
communicating the main message of the program.
-
Majority
of the villages (50%) do not have common meetings for
men and women. Project is not creating collaborative and
common spaces for men and women.
-
Even
if efforts are made by PFA (25%), men dominated in these
meetings.
-
Only
in limited number of cases, where NGO facilitated the
project, women and men could discuss issues together on
equal plane.
-
Non
APRLP project have long way to go on gender integration.
Even in case of APRLP projects, where GO PIA facilitates
there is a wide variety of practices -both gender
sensitive and not so gender sensitive.
|
|
Q6 |
Are
there any formal agreements / MoU between PFA and GP? How
did this happen? Do you know the details / content of the
same? |

|
|
The
partnership between PFA and Grama Panchayati is an important
step in making both parties accountable to the objectives of
the project as well as to each other. This MOU is expected
to institutionalize their relationship and give stability to
the roles of PFA in the project. This MOU concept is
introduced in new projects of APRLP. Earlier this practice
was not there. The process of entering into MOU is expected
to be a very transparent and participatory. The concerned
member would have long discussions and enter into MOU in an
informed manner. |
|
What is happening and how is
this happening? |
-
The
formal MOU is not signed between Grama Panchayati and
PFA in majority of the cases (63%) cases.
-
Formal
MOU is signed only in case of APRLP projects in NGO and
GO PFAs. This is observed in new projects. But the
parties of the MOU, particularly common villagers/ Grama
Panchayati members are ignorant of the contents of the
MOU. Only limited leaders of Grama Panchayati are
vaguely aware of this MOU. The administrative
requirement of getting an MOU is completed by PFA,
without understanding the importance of this
requirement.
-
There
is transparency and terms of partnerships between
Watershed Based Institutions (Grama Panchayati and
Committee) and PFA are clear only when PFA made special
efforts on this theme. Even it is not required as per
the previous guidelines, there was an agreement (formal
and informal) between watershed committee and NGO PIA.
This initiative by PIA gave considerable strength to the
partnership between NGO PIA and Grama Panchayati.
|