|
Many critiques negate the term "livelihoods" as one of
those new buzzwords in the development jargon.
Suddenly everyone seems to be busy promoting
livelihoods of poor. Many are trying to bring their
past experiences into the framework of livelihoods, to
gain some credibility. Irrespective of the criticism
associated with the term, many agree that the
framework of livelihoods provides an over arching and
comprehensive understanding of the reality in a
systematic manner. The contribution from international
donors (SDC, DFID, OXFAM, UNDP and others) and
academic institutions (IDS, IRMA and others) in
developing conceptual frameworks and crystallizing the
philosophy was well recognized.
Watershed Development program also tried to expand its
scope by adopting the terminology of livelihoods and
tried to rediscover itself in Andhra Pradesh.
Conceptually, can watershed program contribute to the
cause of livelihoods approaches/ philosophy? WASSAN
facilitated a study to analyze the preparedness of
watershed program in addressing the livelihoods
concerns using the key words of livelihoods
framework.

For details ....
Watershed Development Program in Andhra Pradesh :
Its implications on Livelihoods of Rural Poor

|